
How "Save Gramps" rallied Miamians against ultra-luxury takeover
Six weeks ago, Gramps Getaway owner Adam Gersten took to social media, urging Miami residents to "Save Gramps" by voting "No" on Referendum 3, the proposed redevelopment of the Rickenbacker and Marine Stadium marinas.
Why it matters: The response underscores how many Miamians are fed up with the influx of outside development at the cost of local, beloved institutions.
What they're saying: Gersten and others, including former elected officials, argue it's simply a bad agreement — an under-market deal struck a decade ago by now-former officials that does nothing to protect the environment and the city's natural resources.
Yes, but: For Miami native Natalie Rivas, it's that the conversation is happening "in the context of already losing all of our third spaces."
The other side: Supporters of the referendum argue it will revamp the aging marina into a "more active, welcoming waterfront destination" and "expand public access" at no cost to taxpayers.
The big picture: In recent years, establishments like Shuckers were replaced with luxury developments and a slew of longtime bars and restaurants closed, with owners often citing skyrocketing rent and changing environments.
Zoom in: While the conversation was already occurring, questions about who gets to call this city home and who its future is being built for have come into sharper focus, in part because of the referendum.
The intrigue: Rivas, who attended Las Rosas' "Road to the Midterms" kickoff event, said the referendum is what got her activated in this year's midterm elections.
What's next: Virginia Key's future will be determined on Election Day, Nov. 3.